It led the way and laid the basis for all Modern Speech Bibles to secure a large place. It is very small, with one kneeling-place, and behind a screen was a Pieta the size of life (i.e. Not only this, but: The Rheims-Douay and the King James Version were published LESS than THIRTY years apart..The Rheims-Douay has been REPEATEDLY changed to APPROXIMATE the King James. Sadly, the average churchgoer doesn't realize it, and worst, the one's that have been warned don't care enough to Please research the evidence. No, I am not talking about conspiracy theories which are often based on flights of fancy, but about actual attempts to repeat actions and words, etc. An Understandable History of the Bible - Chapter 8: Westcott and Hort [127] He added that "most of the differences are due to the greater accuracy of the NW as a literal, conservative translation". Westcott and Hort were Jesuits to their darkest core. I had learnt, like other Protestant children, that the Pope was the Antichrist, and that Gregory VII had been a special revelation of that being. Translators are given a list of words and expressions commonly used in the English New World Translation with related English words grouped together (e.g. Westcott and Hort agree upon plan of a joint revision of the text of the Greek Testament. And we can continue: As we have observed, continental (German and French) higher criticism was primarily concerned with destroying the value of the content of the Bible. But deliver us from evil. And if they are ignored, it can only be because of a deceived mind and heart. . May 17th the Revised Version is published in England, selling two million copies within four days. Hort and Westcott were committed Communists. Oct., 22nd after Trinity Sunday Westcott: Do you not understand the meaning of Theological Development? [49], The master text used for translating the Old Testament into English was Kittel's Biblia Hebraica. Anthony A. Hoekema, The Four Major Cults, Christian Science, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormonism, Seventh-day Adventism, William B. Eerdmans, 1963. Desperate to ward off these closing events of human history and, hopefully, to quench them entirely, Satan began turning loose on the world a flood of error, apostasy, and perversion. [105], Allen Wikgren (member of the New Revised Standard Version committee, as well as the committee which produced the USB Greek text) said in 1952, "independent readings of merit often occur in other modern speech versions, such as Verkyl's New Testament (1945) and the Jehovah's Witnesses' edition of the New Testament (1950)". The fact is that the Westcott-Hort text represents the first widely-accepted departure from the Received Text in the post-Reformation era, and the modern English versions descend directly from the W-H text. Westcott and myself have for above seventeen years been preparing a Greek text of the New Testament. In 1851, Hort and Westcott also started the Ghost Society, which was first billed as the study of spiritual events, but in time it became more of a sance group. ""Between-the-Lines" Translations of the Bible". [16][17][13] According to the publishers, one of the main reasons for producing a new translation was that most Bible versions in common use, including the Authorized Version (King James), employed archaic language. So instead she used subtlty. In 1993, Gail Riplinger published New Age Bible Versions. The two major editors of these manuscripts were Westcott and Hort. As you can see, even then, Catholics, like modern publishers, had to rework and rewrite their falsities many times over, and STILL did not get it right! Helvidius had authentic manuscripts, the genuine post-apostolic copies taken directly from the originals. It has been ALTERED and MODIFIED until scarcely ANY verse REMAINS as it was ORIGINALLY published. "How the Governing Body Differs From a Legal Corporation:. THE EVIDENCE IS AT LEAST 618 TO 2!. But the mind was set by these so-called scholars to trash the Textus Receptus.(Hunt). The New Testament was written in "Koine" Greek, not the Greek that the Catholic Church, via Jesuits, used to counter the Great . "[94] While a member of the denomination, Rolf Furulia former professor in Semitic languagessaid that a literal translation that follows the sentence structure of the source language rather than target language must be somewhat wooden and unidiomatic. Who were Westcott and Hort, and what did they have to do with the text Anti Christ, Bible, Christianity, Doctrine, Roman Catholic Church, 3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? The Queen was dismayed because she really wanted someone from the Anglican or Presbyterian folds. (Baron von Tischendorf, quoted in John E Remsberg, The Christ, p. 272). That is, if the manuscript is not a forgery, as seems highly probable! Ed. They are based on the Greek New Testament compiled by a couple of heretic infidel blasphemers named Westcott and Hort (you will see this when you read their own words below). Once they gained the trust of the already cautious Christians, they betrayed them to the atheistic authorities. In Old Testament criticism, the concept of documentary hypothesis won the thinking of the liberals. The Emancipation Act of 1829 made it legal for Roman Catholics to become elected to parliament. Westcott formed a club while an undergraduate at Cambridge called Hermes.2 Hermes is another name for Satan and was bi-sexual or androgynous. Now the earth was formless and desolate, and there was darkness upon the surface of the watery deep, and God's active force was moving about over the surface of the waters. Gnostic Alexandrian manuscripts, why Westcott and Hort picked it up "[97], In 1960, Frederick William Danker wrote, "not to be snubbed is the New World Translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, Rendered from the Original by the New World Translation Committee 'the orthodox' do not possess all the truth, yet one does well to 'test the spirits'. [136], In 2004, Xabier Pikaza wrote of the Spanish translation, "Traduccin del Nuevo Mundo is the name given by Jehovah's Witnesses to their version of the Bible, which is based on the conviction that the other versions, in all languages, are somehow tainted by the presuppositions of the various churches and Christian confessions. Yes it is easy to outwit most Christians with lies. Wilkinson in his book (B Wilkinson, The Authorised Bible Vindicated, Leaves-of-Autumn Books Inc. Arizona), has a whole chapter on how the Catholic Jesuits captured the thinking of Oxford University in England. They sent missionaries to Egypt, which was the land of Isis (Queen of Heaven) and Horus (the sun god), and Baal worship (which began with Nimrod). Adherents to new bible versions are like this. It is known that, with Froude by his side, Newman asked Wiseman what it would take to return England to the Roman faith. This is exactly what the new version writers did to the KJAV and its original sources! In the New Testament, for example, Paul was rejected as the author of anything. Why would the Catholics do this? Even so, where necessary, Paul named names, and so did Jesus! Clearly, Westcott and Hort were Occult practitioners during the time that they were revising the Greek Text of the New Testament. ): In my first term at the University, the controversial fires were beginning to blaze . Then, when Bishop Challoner got hold of the version, 1749-52, it was changed so dramatically that Cardinal Newman said the new version was virtually a completely new translation. Bearing in mind that the Jesuits are Romes storm-troopers, and no branch of Romanism can carry on without Romes order and blessing, look at what Jesuits say about the Bible (in a Jesuit meeting in Cheri, Italy, 1825), thegenuineBible that can be traced back through the centuries to thegenuinesources: Then the Bible, that serpent which with head erect and eyes flashing, threatens us (the Jesuits) with its venom while it trails along the ground, shall be changed into a rod as soon as we (the Jesuits) are able to seize itfor three centuries past this cruel asp has left us no repose. I must work out and examine the argument in more detail, but at present my feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable. (Life, Vol.I, p.416). }, What a wild storm of unbelief seems to have seized my whole system.(Op. A. Hort (1881) was used as the basis for translating the New Testament into English. It is almost laughable that many who use these corrupt modern versions also oppose Rome in their speech! 1, p. 94 [November 11, 1847]. They were using the Jesuitic method adapted by Ignatius Loyola from an earlier baptized pagan, Clement of Alexandria (about A.D. 200). It is enough that there is deep, intensely deep, emotion such as the mother of the Lord may have had. (Page 183), (Hort had the same opinions. (Westcott went on to say that he could not speak of the Old Testament with adequate knowledge. In 1851, Hort and Westcott started the Ghost Society which over the years included some of the most influential intellectuals in England including future Prime Minister Arthur Balfour. PDF The Political and Occult Connections of Westcott and Hort The Alexandrian school had no qualms about deception uttered for the greater good of a cause. In this book, she alleges that Westcott and Hort were practitioners of the occult. I urge all readers to abandon EVERY modern version and to return to the KJV. . Their views on Scripture and the Text are highlighted. He characterized these as "an insult to the Word of God", citing various verses of Genesis as examples. But the publication of the Scofield Bible resurrected the old Jesuit futurism with a Zionist twist.Today the policies of our country are dramatically influenced by futurism and Christian Zionism while few have even heard of historicism. He produced the Vulgate (used as a major source by W&H, and Tischendorf before them). This REVISED Greek text of Westcott and Hort, the NT based largely on the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts (and from which most modern translations come) DIFFERS from the basic Textus Receptus inwait for it.5,337 places! As I have suggested elsewhere, the monks wanted to burn the supposed Sinaiticus because it was such a bad manuscript! Westcott & Hort: Translator's Beliefs We can find coincidences throughout life, but when there are multiple coincidences, all repeating the same things, we must start to look for a conspiracy of thought and action, for true coincidences are random by nature. pp.251,252). The Movement elevated Higher and Textual Critics to positions of power in the universities, so that propaganda could begin in earnest. According to the publishers, better manuscript evidence had made it possible to determine with greater accuracy what the original writers intended, particularly in more obscure passages, allowing linguists to better understand certain aspects of the original languages. So the Revisers went on changing until they altered the Greek text in 5,337 places(Dr. Everts, The Westcott and Hort Text Under Fire, Jan. 1921). ..The most downright claims to infallibility are made by the Apocalyptist, as for example in the NT REVELATION(see 22:6, 16, 18-19) a book which some of the WISEST THINKERS of the early Church wished to exclude from the canon, and which as A WHOLE, is SUB-CHRISTIAN in tone and outlook Moses HAS LEFT US NO WRITINGS, and we know little of him with certaintyFor indeed the bare idea of vicarious expiation(substitutionary atonement) is NOT WHOLLY RATIONAL.(Letter to John Ellerton, 1848). A Little History: Cyrus I Scofield and the Tribulation Westcott was a bishop in the Anglican church and Hort a Professor of divinity but both men had abandoned their Christian faith. They called the Textus Receptus 'vile' and refused to believe that God preserved His holy words. Sinaiticus]) Thus, we see that the Revised Version is not a revision in any sense whatever, but a new Bible based on different manuscripts from the King James, on Catholic manuscripts in fact. The Occult Activities of Westcott and Hort. "[123], Theologian William Barclay concluded, "the deliberate distortion of truth by this sect is seen in the New Testament translation. It is indicated that they provide a bridge between apostate Christianity and the occult and the New Age Movement. 98, 99; F.J. Firth, The Holy Gospel, pp. This means that W&H, influenced heavily by Tischendorf, who was himself led by a corrupt document (Vaticanus) and a bad forgery (Sinaiticus), and all three edited by a Jesuit cardinal, formed the basis for those modern versions you may now be harbouring in your hand, heart, house, church or Bible school! During the period from 1963 to 1989, the New World Translation became available in ten additional languages. Together, they produced The New Testament in the Original Greek, one of the earliest examples of modern textual criticism. If preaching is the chief means of grace, it must emanate not from the church, but from the preacher, and besides placing him in a false position, it places him in a fearfully dangerous one. (Life, Vol.I, pp.44,45).
Registered Voters In Elko County Nevada,
Jostens Ltm Class Ring Value,
Scatteredinterpolant Matlab,
Wales Rugby Shirt 2023,
Articles W